By 1930, the Conservative Republican President Hoover’s America was lurching into an economic collapse of near-medieval proportions. From 1930 to 1933, national income dove from $81 Billion to $39 Billion. In 1932, 273,000 families were evicted from their homes. The hide bound conservative Hoover urged caution and only supported private relief efforts. Incapable of dealing with the crisis because of his ideology, he became the most hated man in America. In the last days of his presidency, thirteen million people were unemployed, one million roamed the country in railroad boxcars, food riots were breaking out, as relief stations ran out of cash, banks were closed or suspended in twenty-three states, and the New York Stock Exchange was shut down. The Conservative movement that had ruled the country for decades proved incapable of common sense solutions to the fundamental needs of governing in a crisis.

The period of the great depression, and the election of FDR and his “New Deal” policies, saw the greatest expansion of American Liberal Democratic Social Justice, planting this ideology squarely in the middle of the political spectrum, between the extreme ideologies of the totalitarian dictatorships and defusing anarchist chaos.

Franklin Roosevelt’s Economic Bill of Rights:

“The right to a useful and remunerative job in the industries or shops or farms or mines of the nation
The right to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing and recreation
The right of every family to a decent home
The right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health The right to adequate protection from the economic fears of old age,
sickness, accident and unemployment
And the right to a good education.”

Liberal Democrats generally believe in the possibility of progress. They believe things can be made to work for the benefit of the people, that the future will be better, that obstacles can be overcome.

Liberals contend that the character of the modern capitalist economy; and the side effects of industrialization, technology, globalism, and corporate abuses, require government intervention and regulation of Corporate power. Liberal democrats have traditionally advocated programs to protect; minorities, the poor, the weak, the old, the worker, and the economically displaced, but Conservatives always advocate in the interest of the super-rich and the ruling class, and act on the maxim;

“Let the government take care of the rich, and the rich will take care of the poor.”

The Constitution provides that the House of Representatives can have no less than 50 members one for each state) and based on the 2000 Census, if they were to follow the Constitution, no more than 9,381 Representatives would be seated. (based on one for every 30,000 people) This number would be unmanageable, but the People’s House is in desperate need of augmentation.

For the first 130 years of the Republic Congress never failed to execute this important responsibility, adding about 40 members per decade. In 1820 the House members increased the Representation to 45,000 to one. By 1910, A conservative Congress decided that 435 Representatives for a population of 92 million people was enough! In 1920 the House dominated by the Republican Party, refused to reapportion the existing seats by a vote of 276-77, with the result that the Congressional districts for all elections between 1912 and 1930 were exactly the same regardless of the huge shifts in population from rural to urban areas.

Later the Conservative Republican Congress passed the “Permanent Apportionment Act of 1929,” which was signed into law by that great democratic leader Herbert Hoover. The act froze the number of Representatives (435) and apportioned them among the states, on the basis of the census; and over a Century of constitutional tradition was summarily changed without a vote of the people. The battle to limit the size of the People’s House was not just a fight between rural and urban areas; it was a fight between the current citizens and the masses of immigrants that were also crowding into the big cities, where they could find employment. The long awaited redistricting of the 1932 election was a major factor in the overwhelming victory of Franklin Roosevelt.

In 2000 our representation was 646,947 to one. This is an astoundingly undemocratic situation that is never discussed in elections.

Among the other major Western Republics the representation ratio is much more democratic. In Great Britain the ratio is 90,000 to one, and in Germany it is 136,000 to one. In Russia it is 326,000 to one and even in the People’s Republic of China it is 415,000 to one; neither of which are considered democracies by Free World standards.

We now have a population of almost 300 million and we are still represented by only 435 Members of Congress. The effects of this Oligarchical system was evident in the last election, when only three House seats changed hands, the smallest turnover in history. With such large ratios, individual Congressional representatives have greater difficulty maintaining any sort of meaningful communication with their constituents; causing them to rely on Special Interest groups; and running for office has only become possible if a candidate is independently wealthy or as is more often the case, they are bankrolled by Corporate Special Interests.

For American Democracy to survive there is an urgent need to increase the number of seats in the House to a ratio of no more than 250,000 to one, and this should be an issue in the next elections. More seats would provide for more representation in the high density cities and would serve to stop gerrymandering such as was conducted by the DeLay forces in Texas in 2004.

The NFC Republicans will fight to maintain the present undemocratic scheme, as new seats would inevitably benefit minorities and urban areas, and reduce the power of more conservative and backward rural areas.

The Democratic Party has failed to challenge the system, and demand more Representation in the People’s House” which is becoming more like a lower House of Lords!

The Universal Democracy Initiative

In September of 2005, the NFC Republican Congress was placed into a very uncomfortable spotlight.

On July 25, 2005, the New York Sun reported that; “they will be set to consider new legislation that would commit America to ending tyranny the world over.”

Tucked inside the House version of a bill that authorizes spending on foreign aid is the language of what is known as the ADVANCE Democracy Act. The act instructs American ambassadors and embassy staffs to draw up democracy transition plans for unfree regimes, with input from nonviolent opposition movements in the various countries. While Congress has passed laws that require America to work with democratic opposition groups for specific countries - such as the 1998 Iraq Liberation Act - never before has it considered a law that would, as ADVANCE proposes, “commit United States foreign policy to the challenge of achieving Universal Democracy.”

A sponsor of the legislation, Rep. Tom Lantos, a Democrat of California, predicted that in the Senate the bill, sponsored there by Senator McCain, a Republican of Arizona, and Senator Lieberman, a Democrat of Connecticut, would not be opposed. “I don't think there will be any opposition in the Senate,” he told The New York Sun.

The little-noticed legislation passed the House a week ago today as part of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act by a vote of 351-78. Mr. Lantos last week told the Sun that the bill “puts the meat on the bones of the president's second inaugural address.” In that speech, President Bush said, “It is the policy of the United States to seek and support the growth of democratic movements and institutions in every nation and culture, with the ultimate goal of ending tyranny in our world.”

The bill would allow the State Department to “use all instruments of United States influence to support, promote, and strengthen democratic principles, practices, and values in foreign countries.” It charges the CIA and Treasury Department with tracking the personal assets of dictators and their associates.

ADVANCE would require the Secretary of State to approve an annual report designating nations as either democratic, undemocratic, or in transition. Currently, Foggy Bottom does not make such formal distinctions, though a human rights group created by Congress, the Freedom House, does, ranking countries around the world as “free,” “partly free,” and “not free.”

Despite Mr. Lantos’s view that he is advancing Mr. Bush’s policy, the White House at least officially opposes most of the legislation’s toughest measures.

A July 20 statement of administration policy by the Bush administration said that it "appreciates the intent" of the proposal but objects to provisions that require the secretary of state to categorize countries according to whether they are democratic. The statement says the bill could "constrain the Secretary's authority to determine appropriate terms and conditions to enable discretionary foreign assistance to best serve our diverse foreign policy objectives." The statement also rejected measures in the bill that would create an undersecretary of state for democracy and global affairs.

Despite some of the official objections, there is evidence that Foggy Bottom is quietly making preparations for when the ADVANCE Democracy Act becomes law. Two administration officials and one congressional source confirmed this week that the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor has begun asking the State Department's regional bureaus to draw up a list of countries that would be eligible for the legislation's democratic transition plans. The State Department is also looking into better ways of marshaling foreign aid to meet the legislation's objections.

The legislation, the formal title of which is the Advance Democratic Values, Address Nondemocratic Countries, and Enhance Democracy Act of 2005, is the brainchild of a former American ambassador, Mark Palmer, who is on Freedom House's board of trustees. Mr. Palmer was the chief American official negotiating the release of Natan Sharansky from a Soviet gulag and served as America's ambassador to Hungary when that country threw off the shackles of its Soviet puppet government.

In 2003, Mr. Palmer wrote "Breaking the Real Axis of Evil," in which he proposed that the goal of American foreign policy should be to assist nonviolent, democratic oppositions in the world's outposts of tyranny. He began shopping the legislation last year to congressional offices and says he found a lot of enthusiasm for the idea among members of both parties.

“The overall vision of this law is that we should take the bipartisan goal of a dictator-free world and institutionalize that in our diplomacy and foreign policy,” he said. Mr. Palmer added, “One of the most important things in the bill is that it provides for the beginning of a dialogue between democratic forces and our embassies in nondemocratic countries.” When asked whether he believed there should be an exception for China, which has often been excluded from pro-democracy policies in the past, he said, “No, I don't think there should be any exceptions.”

Lantos has cleverly challenged the NFC Republicans to put their actions where their words are, and this will present a major problem to the Nationalist-Conservatives which have cozied up to some of the most undemocratic and tyrannical regimes in the world. There are already signs that the NFC Republicans will water down the bill, and then slow roll it to death. >

Another question is, assuming that there will be some standards to evaluate governments, with a Democracy report card; where would Mr. Bush’s United States rank, in a current listing of most and least Democratic Governments in the world?

The Democratic Party has the makings of a Perfect Storm issue for the next elections, if the Democratic leadership doesn’t fail to follow through.

SHORT TERM EMERGENCY SURVIVAL MEASURES

“…whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends (that is, life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness) it is the right of the people to alter it or abolish it.”
The Declaration of Independence, 1776

Urgent Action Needed to Alter The Government in November 2006

The 2006 elections are crucial to our survival as a People’s Republic. It is vital that the Democratic Party regain control of the United States Senate. This will enable this severely weakened opposition party to restrain this irresponsible President and Congress from enacting into law, additional extreme NFC policies, programs, and from engaging in any further foreign aggression.

“Congress shall immediately upon our inauguration, initiate amendments to the Constitution providing (a) that the President shall have the authority to institute and execute all necessary measures for the conduct of the government during this critical epoch; (b), that Congress shall serve only in an advisory capacity, calling to the attention of the President and his aides and Cabinet any needed legislation, but not acting upon same until authorized by the President so to act; and (c), that the Supreme Court shall immediately have removed from its jurisdiction the power to negate, by ruling them to be unconstitutional or by any other judicial action, any or all acts of the President, his duly appointed aides, or Congress.”
“It Can’t Happen Here” by Sinclair Lewis, 1935

Traditional conventional wisdom of the Democratic Party consultants is to target and spend resources to defeat moderate Republicans that are in mixed swing states, If this strategy is followed, it will be self defeating. Moderate and traditional-conservative Republicans such as John McCain, are preferable to NFC Republicans, and it is important to target those extreme Senators that represent the worst record of aggressive foreign policies, support of torture, sellout to the Special Corporate Intersects, and those with any taint of corruption. It would be better to go after the most extreme of the NFC Republican Senators, for example; Jeff Sessions, Sam Brownback, Rick Santorum, Bill Frist, George Allen, Wayne Allard, Chris Bond, James Inhofe, Tom Coburn, Thad Cochran, Trent Lott, Pat Roberts, Ted Stevens, and John Cornyn, when they are up for re-election. A challenge must also be mounted against every NFC Republican, vulnerable to ethics charges. Their records of un-American behavior can be successfully challenged. The Campaign issues are contained in this Essay.

A unified Universal Democracy Alliance should mount a massive and unprecedented Public Diplomacy program consisting of; mass communication and on-the ground volunteer Liberty Now Squads (each squad consisting of one each representative of; Labor, Women, Black, Latino, Poor, Mothers of slain Iraqi War Soldiers, Veterans, Social Security Recipients, etc., and their leader should be selected by the group. These grassroots Squads would hold rallies and press conferences to voice their objections to the NFC candidate, from the perspective of their unique issues. They should be selected from inside the state, given training on the fundamentals of: Comparative Ideologies, public speaking and the issues described in this book. Members of the Liberty Now Squad from the Senator’s home state must also be certified to register voters. We need literally thousands of such volunteers to take the training and become vocal advocates of Liberal Democracy.

It is urgent that we work to turn out every freedom loving man and woman in America to defend themselves against the NFC Republican threat. Apathetic Americans appear to have no interest in politics, or they believe that there is so little difference between the two major parties, that only half of them turn out to vote.

This is a false impression. The Democratic Party, weak as it has been; has traditionally responded to the public’s appeals and opinions (albeit frequently late) but the NFC Republicans, are actually proud to proclaim that they ignore polls, and the appeals of the people. The Bush regime is notorious for ignoring Public Opinion and the appeals of practically every professional group that has complained about the Iraq war, the continuing occupation, the casualties, the torture policies, the loss of liberties, and the people’s widespread opposition to his domestic policies. Minority and poor members of the electorate, that have suffered the most from these policies, have continually failed to vote in large percentages. This must be corrected!

American history confirms that all Conservative Republican regimes have been adamant and stubborn in their governance; such as Herbert Hoover who was totally insensitive to the great suffering in depression era America. They characteristically do not respond to the people; preferring to take their advice from the leaders of the Corporate, Religious, Financial, and other Conservative elites; that are primarily interested in preserving the Special Interests of the Super-rich and powerful.

They are as isolated and oblivious to the opinions and pleas of the American people in 2006, as was the despotic King George, in 1776.

In the last election, it has been calculated that only 48% of eligible voters came to the polls. This is the major cause of the gradual loss of our precious Liberties. In the small country of Italy, for comparison, 93% of the electorate voted in the last national election! (Unfortunately too many of them voted the wrong way, and they are now paying the price!)

“Just because you don’t take an interest in Politics, doesn’t mean Politics won’t take an interest in you.”
Pericles, 430 BC

For the survival of Liberty, Freedom and Democracy throughout the shrinking world, the American people, citizens of the most militarily powerful nation in history, must re-embrace the wise fundamental democratic secular governing principles of the U.S. Constitution, and be born again in a Universal Democratic Faith, and in a religious Interfaith Alliance of respect for people of all faiths, embracing the redemptory teachings of Jesus the Christ, Buddha, and other great and gentle moral teachers.

“If the persons entrusted with power become usurpers. The Citizens must rush tumultuously to arms, without concert, without system, without resource, except in their courage and despair. The Usurpers, clothed with the forms of legal authority, can too often crush the opposition in embryo.”
Alexander Hamilton, the Federalist Papers, No. 28

First however, survival of Liberty, demands we throw the NFC Republican, Fascist War Criminals and Anti-Christs, out of the halls of power, while we still have time, and the right to do so. That will require a massive organizing effort to inform, activate, and motivate all Americans to the serious threat we face, if the NFC Republicans and their fanatical CNF Crusader partners maintain absolute control of all branches of the U.S. Government in 2006.

Aristocratic Power Seekers:

“While power is in the hands of the people, or democratic part of the community, more especially as at present, it is easy, according to the general course of human affairs, for the few influential men in the community to obtain conventions, alterations in government, and to persuade the common people that they may change for the better, and to get from them a part of the power.. the government in this case being beneficial to the few… you may discover in all the actions of these men an evident dislike to free and equal government, and they will go systematically to work to change, essentially, the forms of government in this country—these are called Aristocrats.”
Richard Henry Lee, October, 1787

Defend the Jewel of Liberty

“Is the relinquishment of trial by jury, and the Liberty of the press necessary for your Liberty? Will the abandonment of your most sacred rights tend to the security of your Liberty? Liberty, the greatest of all earthly blessings—give us that precious jewel, and you may take everything else…Guard with jealous attention the public Liberty. Suspect every one who approaches that jewel.”
Patrick Henry, June 5, 1788

Liberal-Democracy is the political art which constrains government to insure the protection of the precious Liberties of the people. The words Liberty and Liberal come from the same Latin root, and must always be used together with Democracy, to describe the political ideology of the Enlightenment, that evolved from the greatest political philosophers of the 17th through the 19th Century, in England, France, and America. It was the political religion of most of the Aristocratic founders of the United States of America.

Good Advice from the Father of Our Country:

“As mankind becomes more liberal, they will be more apt to allow that all those who conduct themselves as worthy members of the community are equally entitled to the protections of civil government. I hope ever to see America among the foremost nations of Justice and Liberality.”
President George Washington

After 30 years of name-calling, the NFC Republicans have finally succeeded in separating the word which describes the philosophy of Liberalism, from the word which describes Government of, by, and for the people. This was a calculated and deliberate tactic of divide and conquer, which has become a hallmark of the NFC movement. They knew that no American would willingly follow a party that openly expressed contempt for Democracy, so by attacking Liberals, they forced the Democratic Party to divide itself into Liberal and Conservative camps; while they have become lock-step Neo-Fascist-Conservatives.

“The history of Liberty is a history of resistance. The history of Liberty is a history of the limitation of government power, not the increase of it.”
President Woodrow Wilson, September 9, 1912

They have been so successful in vilifying the political name Liberal, that now almost all Democratic Politicians go to great lengths to prove that they are not Liberal. During the Democratic Presidential primaries in 2004, none of the Candidates admitted to having a Liberal voting record. In recent years, the Democrats and their base have been so intimidated by these tactics, they have taken to calling themselves Progressives or Populists. Courageous Liberal Democratic leaders have understood this and stood their ground.

“But if by ‘Liberal’ they mean someone who looks ahead and not behind, someone who welcomes new ideas without rigid reactions, someone who cares about the welfare of the people…. If that is what they mean by ‘Liberal’ then I’m damn proud to say I’m a ‘Liberal.’”
President John F. Kennedy

The Progressive era was essentially a period when the politicians responded to the majority of American merchants who were united against the excesses of the Monopolistic Financial Trusts. The Progressives had no loyalty to the honorable political philosophy of Liberal Democracy, or the people, thus calling Liberal Democrats Progressives is a historical mistake, and a cop out. There was no group of Progressive or Populist thinkers that inspired the Enlightenment. The leaders of the Democratic Party, particularly the DLC, have failed to understand that by allowing the Neo-Fascists to demonize the name Liberal, they have fallen into their trap, and permitted the desecration of the honorable ancient historical ideology of the Enlightenment.

“Justice and Liberty! Those are the words that have got to ring like a bugle across the world.”
George Orwell, The Road To Wigan, 1937

We are the beneficiaries of the historic struggles of mankind for Freedom and Liberty, especially the British, American and French revolutions, for which so many people suffered and died to free themselves from the chains of the Conservative Aristocratic ruling classes of; Royalty, tyrants, priests, and dictators, which had dominated mankind since the dawn of history.

If we don’t defend the principles of American Liberal Democracy, now when they are under renewed attack in the U.S., they will be lost to the world forever.

“I know not what course others may take; but as for me give me Liberty, or give me death.”
Patrick Henry, March 23, 1775

Therefore, one of the first actions that must be taken is, to proudly rehabilitate the political ideology and the institution of American Liberal Democracy. This, among other measures, will require an educational program to increase understanding of the great blessings of living in a country blessed with Liberty and governed by the principles of Liberal Democracy. The Principles of Liberal Democracy must be understood, published and taught to every man, woman, and child living in this country. It is not necessary to become a politician or a Political Scientist. We must only learn the most fundamental principles of Liberal Democracy and its heritage, if we are to confront the evils of the NFC movement, and to insure that our children live in a free Society in the future.

“Proclaim Liberty throughout the land unto all of the inhabitants thereof.”
The King James Bible, Leviticus 25:10, Inscribed around the Liberty Bell

Discredit the False Prophets of Neo-Conservatism

“The two parties which divide the state, the party of Conservatism and that of innovation, are very old, and have disputed the possession of the world ever since it was made.”
Ralph Waldo Emerson, 1841

Having been a moderate traditional-conservative Republican for 30 years, the author has an insiders insight into the NFC Republican agenda, philosophy and Ideology, that has evolved over the past 50 years. The scales finally dropped from my eyes after the witch hunt that took place during the Presidency of Bill Clinton. I have never fully supported Clinton or Gore, because I despised their Conservative Light approach to governing; while claiming to embrace American Liberal Democracy.

Nothing demonstrates this better than the fact that before leaving office, President Clinton granted pardons to very wealthy donors, when he could have struck a meaningful blow for Liberty; by pardoning all of the thousands of poor white, black, and Latino prisoners, serving unjustified long sentences in Federal prisons for mere possession of crack cocaine, and Marijuana.

Make no mistake, the Clinton administration was light years better than the current regime; but the results of the last two elections should by now have proved to all supporters of American Liberal Democracy, that the DLC dominated Democratic Party, which has a good heart, needs political brain surgery to re-establish its priorities.

First and foremost is the need to confront the New or Neo-Conservatism, currently embraced by the rulers of the NFC Republican Party, which has moved far to the right of even the most radical of all previous Conservative political leaders.

“Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice” and “moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.”
Barry Goldwater

On October 23, 2005 Eric Alterman wrote about the Liberal dilemma. These are some excerpts from his article;

Here is the liberals' problem in a nutshell: More than 30 percent of Americans happily answer to the appellation "conservative," while 18 percent call themselves "liberal." And yet when questioned by pollsters, a super-majority of more than 60 percent take positions liberal, in everything but name. Indeed, on many if not most issues, Americans hold views well to the left of those espoused by almost any national Democratic politician.

In a May 2005 survey published by the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press, 65 percent of respondents said they favor providing health insurance to all Americans, even if it means raising taxes, and 86 percent said they favor raising the minimum wage. Seventy-seven percent said they believe the country “should do whatever it takes to protect the environment.”

A September 2005 Gallup Poll finds that 59 percent consider the Iraq War a mistake and 63 percent agree that US forces should be partially or completely withdrawn.

Nevertheless, extremist right-wingers, including a few apparent criminals, enjoy a stranglehold on our political system and media discourse. And so the majority views of the American people are treated with contempt by pundits and politicians alike. Because right-wingers have been so adept at controlling the political discourse, they have succeeded in moving the Democrats rightward too.

Brooks himself has pointed out that the conservative media have “cohered to form a dazzlingly efficient ideology delivery system that swamps liberal efforts to get their ideas out." In fact, all that's necessary to discredit an individual or an idea in the present poisoned atmosphere is to apply the label "liberal,” which conservatives equate with “treason”, "“slander” and “treachery.” (Ann Coulter); “idiocy” (Mona Charen); "“Communism” (David Horowitz); inspiration for“child murder” (Newt Gingrich); “Islamic terrorism” (Andrew Sullivan, Christopher Hitchens, Horowitz again); and “priestly pedophilia.” (Rick Santorum).

Mafia-like manipulation of the levers of power in the House, Senate and White House that not only frustrates the Democratic opposition, but cuts off their sources of financial support; and a network of New Corporate and Clerical Power Brokers, like the aforementioned DeLay, Grover Norquist and countless think tanks, media moguls, funders and lobbyists who work together to game the system at a level that is either too complicated or too boring to attract intelligent scrutiny.

With leading Republicans looking at potential jail time and Bush's approval rating in a tailspin, providence has given liberals an opportunity pregnant with possibility. Americans already share our values and no longer remain in thrall to the linguistic terror tactics of right-wing propagandists. What we need now is a liberal language to help people connect needs and desires to “liberals’ vision.”

The language and vision are already available and are described in this book.

The principal challenge facing those, who would influence the American people to return to their Liberal Democratic heritage is; how to discredit the powerful notion of Neo-Conservatism, which is actually a fraudulent value system. If we believe polling and electoral results, more than half of all adult American voters now subscribe to this fraud.

“The Framers made the federal government stronger because of the alarming quantity and dismaying quality of ‘active liberty’ in the states.”
George F. Will, Conservative Columnist, Newsweek, September 26, 2005

With this outrageously false statement, Right wing-conservative Mr. Will demonstrated the hostile attitude of all radical-Conservatives, to the concept of Liberty, held even by those who are not Neo-Fascists. There is no such record of limiting “Active Liberty” in the Constitution, or in the Federalist papers. Like all Conservatives, Will was worried about money. He had reference to concerns raised about creditors being cheated. There was little chance of this in a period when debtors prisons were in use. The strong Federal system or National government, that Will refers to, was primarily intended to provide for a strong defense of the nation, after the problems the Revolutionary Army had holding its troops in service for the duration of the war.

The traditionally moderate, good, and generous people, who are traditional-conservatives (with a small “c”) in all of their day-to-day lives, but very naive about politics; have been blinded by NFC Republican propaganda, masquerading as benign middle class populism and financial and cultural conservatism. In fact, the NFC dogma is no different than that of the Radical- Conservative Pseudo-Populism of the 1930s Fascists, which was a blend of extreme Nationalism, Militarism, Imperialism, dogmatic ideologies, religious and racist primacy, hypocritical righteousness, resentment of social justice, dire and false warnings of the decline of sexual, cultural, and moral values, creation and demonization of hated enemies, and great fear and resistance to social change in the modern world. The 21^st Century NFC Republican dogma is a carbon copy of that dark age.

American Liberals, Socialists, Democrats, and moderates, like their European cousins in pre-war Germany and Italy, are loathe to resort to the practice of name calling, even when it is true; whereas the NFC Republicans have been consistently using these time proven tactics; which were so effectively used against the Liberal and Social Democrats of the 1930s, by the thugs of the original Fascist movements. It is a sad commentary on the gullibility, and political naiveté of the average American, but it works; especially when it is repeated often enough. The next time you listen to a Radical Neo-Conservative propagandist, see how long it takes them to call the opposition Liberals as though the name were somehow akin to leprosy.

This Essay announces it is time to begin calling Neo-Conservative Republicans what they really are…Neo-Fascists!

The Soul of a People is Awakened in Battle against Liberalism:

“The soul of a people, however, can only awaken through sacrifice and pain. A perpetual sacrifice to put up with the stench of putrefying corpses which Liberalism… Skepticism,… and factional politics leaves wafting over the fields.”
Plinio Salgado, Brazilian Integralist Action (AIB), Brazilian Fascist Party, Rio de Janeiro, 1935