Liberty & Democracy Alliance
To secure the blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our posterity
 
    Home > Key Daily Articles > Article #22
Welcome

Updated: November 17, 2008
See asterisked item(s) below
for latest updates

Inauguration
Mission
Founding Documents
Objectives
Vision
Our Heritage
Classics of Liberalism
Key Daily Articles (New Articles) *
LDA Allies
Domestic Issues
Profiles in Courage
Editorials
Straight Talk
The Rise of Neo-Fascism in America
Essential Definitions - Study Aids
Who Was Publius?
Disclaimer
Essays from Publius in Html
Essays from Publius in PDF
Liberate America by Publius - Free Download E-Book

Bush claims power to open Americans' mail without warrants 'Signing statement' says he has power to do so in 'emergency situations.'
By Tom Regan

csmonitor.com

Friday, January 5, 2007


In a move that experts say contradicted the postal reform bill he had just signed into law, President Bush quietly issued a "signing statement" two weeks ago that claimed he has the right to open Americans' first-class US mail without a judge's warrant. The New York Daily News reports that the signing statement was issued on Dec. 20 after the president signed the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act, an act which dealt with mostly 'mundane reform measures' but which also strongly reinforced protections against opening mail without a warrant.

The Daily News says those who have seen the signing statement say it seems to take executive authority far beyond even the limits the Bush administration has pursued in the past few years, and in ways such that the new powers could be easily abused.

"The [Bush] signing statement claims authority to open domestic mail without a warrant, and that would be new and quite alarming," said Kate Martin, director of the Center for National Security Studies in Washington.

"The danger is they're reading Americans' mail," she said.

"You have to be concerned," agreed a career senior US official who reviewed the legal underpinnings of Bush's claim. "It takes Executive Branch authority beyond anything we've ever known."

Dan Froomkin notes in his Washington Post "White House Briefing" blog that even though the Daily News was two weeks late on the story, it still has a scoop because Mr. Bush's signing statements "have been widely ignored by the traditional media." The one exception was the piece by Charles Savage of the Boston Globe that showed that as of April last year, Bush had issued 750 signing statements that said he had the authority to disobey laws enacted by Congress (and signed into law by him) if he thought it was appropriate.

Return to Article List